<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Single upcharge vs multiple in Restaurant Operations</title>
    <link>https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/single-upcharge-vs-multiple/m-p/6328#M2578</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is expected behavior when using the quantity button, (similar situation from a couple weeks ago&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/wing-special/m-p/5852" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/wing-special/m-p/5852&lt;/A&gt; ) you would need to use size based pricing or make the extra dressing detached from the 50c wing item and be just another line item not a modifier of the wings. Although it is a singular wing it is still a singular menu item, could have been a ribeye steak for example, you would expect an uncharged modifier on a steak to be multiplied when a customer ordered 20 of them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 01:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rcmck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-19T01:43:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Single upcharge vs multiple</title>
      <link>https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/single-upcharge-vs-multiple/m-p/6327#M2577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We sell $.50 wings. Server rings in wings item for $.50 and adjusts it to 20 orders. 20 wings = $10. Fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server hits the modifier for extra dressing, which would be a $.50 upcharge. Nope, it is multiplying it by 20 because it is a modifier for the wings and we are ordering 20 of those so instead of charging $.50 for sauce it is charging $10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do i get a modifier to do a singular upcharge and not be multiplied WITH the item?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 01:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/single-upcharge-vs-multiple/m-p/6327#M2577</guid>
      <dc:creator>sidework</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-19T01:19:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single upcharge vs multiple</title>
      <link>https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/single-upcharge-vs-multiple/m-p/6328#M2578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is expected behavior when using the quantity button, (similar situation from a couple weeks ago&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/wing-special/m-p/5852" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/wing-special/m-p/5852&lt;/A&gt; ) you would need to use size based pricing or make the extra dressing detached from the 50c wing item and be just another line item not a modifier of the wings. Although it is a singular wing it is still a singular menu item, could have been a ribeye steak for example, you would expect an uncharged modifier on a steak to be multiplied when a customer ordered 20 of them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 01:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.toasttab.com/t5/restaurant-operations/single-upcharge-vs-multiple/m-p/6328#M2578</guid>
      <dc:creator>rcmck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-19T01:43:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

